Diversity, Color-Blindness, and Other Hegemonic Discourses

Social Philosophy Today 24:91-105 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I will examine the ways in which concepts and ideas that are used for emancipatory purposes eventually backfire and are used to perpetuate systems of domination. Part of my argument will be based on Herbert Marcuse’s essay “Repressive Tolerance.” In this essay, Marcuse examines the way in which the concept of tolerance, which has its origin in the struggle for liberation, is used by members of dominant social groups to advocate for tolerance of their oppressive views. Following Marcuse’s lead, I will argue that almost all emancipatory ideas, particularly diversity and color-blindness in this context, can be co-opted by the dominant social group and used to further domination. I will argue that even our best emancipatory concepts are formed within the context of a hegemonic discourse that alters their meaning and use.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Arnold Farr
University of Kentucky

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references