Thomas Sheehan

Philosophy Today 66 (4):831-857 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thomas Sheehan’s attack on my book Heidegger, l’introduction du nazisme dans la philosophie, addressed neither the book’s topic nor its arguments. He instead highlighted a few isolated details in a sophistic and biased fashion. Moreover, his exposition was interspersed with ad personam insults not typically found in philosophical or scientific discussions. Although I had hitherto resolved not to respond to personal attacks, I owe it to the memory of Johannes Fritsche, who was also attacked by Sheehan, to take my turn to speak and to thereby pay intellectual tribute to Professor Fritsche. The article returns to the interpretation of Being and Time and analyzes the meaning and connotations of Heidegger’s use of the German term Bodenlosigkeit. The key methodological issue concerns the need to study the semantic, historical, and political context of concepts instead of hiding these issues by reducing everything to a battle between dogmatic positions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,070

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-27

Downloads
21 (#729,910)

6 months
11 (#338,852)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Editors' Note.Peg Birmingham & Ian Alexander Moore - 2022 - Philosophy Today 66 (4):829-830.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references