Excessive Subjectivity : Kant, Hegel, Lacan, and the Foundations of Ethics

New York: Columbia University Press. Edited by Deva Kemmis & Astrid Weigert (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How are we to conceive of acts that suddenly expose the injustice of the prevailing order? These acts challenge long-standing hidden or silently tolerated injustices, but as they are unsupported by existing ethical rules they pose a drastic challenge to dominant norms. In Excessive Subjectivity, Dominik Finkelde rereads the tradition of German idealism and finds in it the potential for transformative acts that are capable of revolutionizing the social order.Finkelde's discussion of the meaning and structure of the ethical act meticulously engages thinkers typically treated as opposedKant, Hegel, and Lacanto develop the concept of excessive subjectivity, which is characterized by nonconformist acts that reshape the contours of ethical life. For Kant, the subject is defined by the ethical acts she performs. Hegel interprets Kant's categorical imperative as the ability of an individual's conscience to exceed the existing state of affairs. Lacan emphasizes the transgressive force of unconscious desire on the ethical agent. Through these thinkers Finkelde develops a radical ethics for contemporary times. Integrating perspectives from both analytical and continental philosophy, Excessive Subjectivity is a distinctive contribution to our understanding of the ethical subject.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-27

Downloads
14 (#994,650)

6 months
14 (#253,070)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dominik Finkelde
Munich School Of Philosophy

Citations of this work

Books of Interest.Mark Schaukowitch & Michael Kennedy - 2018 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 51 (1):98-104.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references