Philosophical Forum 45 (1):49-68 (2014)

Paul Formosa
Macquarie University
Kant’s Formula of Humanity (FH) is considered by many, Kant included, to be the most intuitively appealing formulation of the categorical imperative. FH tells us that to treat persons with dignity and respect we must always treat them as ends in themselves and never as mere means. One set of issues raised by FH revolves around how FH is to be justified or grounded and how it relates to the other formulations of the categorical imperative. This set of issues, though important, is not our focus here. Instead, we shall focus on a different set of issues: how do we apply or use this formula in practice, that is, how does this principle work as a moral guide to what duties and obligations we have in particular cases? This paper will seek to answer that question by defending an interpretation and rational reconstruction of FH in terms of two subsidiary principles, the Mere Means Principle (MMP), which grounds perfect duties, and the Ends in Themselves Principle (ETP), which grounds imperfect duties. These two principles will then be applied to a number of examples to illustrate how they work.
Keywords Kant  Formula of Humanity  Dignity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phil.12026
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals.Immanuel Kant - 1785/2002 - Oxford University Press.
The Metaphysics of Morals.Immanuel Kant - 1797/1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.Immanuel Kant - 1785 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.
Treating Others Merely as Means.Samuel Kerstein - 2009 - Utilitas 21 (2):163-180.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Role of Vulnerability in Kantian Ethics.Paul Formosa - 2014 - In Catriona Mackenzie, Wendy Rogers & Susan Dodds (eds.), Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 88-109.
Microaggressions: A Kantian Account.Ornaith O’Dowd - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (5):1219-1232.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the Dignity of Man in Kant.Dietmar von der Pfordten - 2009 - Philosophy 84 (3):371-391.
Kant's Conception of Human Dignity.Oliver Sensen - 2009 - Kant-Studien 100 (3):309-331.
What Does It Mean to Use Someone as "a Means Only": Rereading Kant.Ronald Michael Green - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (3):247-261.
On the Universal Law and Humanity Formulas.Sven Nyholm - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Michigan
Kant's Ethics and Duties to Oneself.Lara Denis - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):321–348.
A Kantian Defense of Prudential Suicide.Michael Cholbi - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (4):489-515.
Dignity, Honour, and Human Rights: Kant's Perspective.Rachel Bayefsky - 2013 - Political Theory 41 (6):0090591713499762.


Added to PP index

Total views
485 ( #11,332 of 2,326,773 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
159 ( #2,779 of 2,326,773 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes