Ecumenical Convergence and Theological Pluralism

Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 44 (4):531-545 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author argues that since previous ecumenical approaches—conflict, conversion, collaboration, compromise—have been minimally effective, the new one of convergence may be more successful.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00406457

DOI

10.5840/thought19694443

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Ecumenical Cross.Samuel H. Miller - 1965 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 40 (1):5-12.
Theological Pluralism and Analogy.David Tracy - 1979 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 54 (1):24-36.
Courage and Compromise.Padraic N. MacKernan - 1987 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 62 (2):159-175.
Morality and Compromise In Politics.Eugene J. McCarthy - 1962 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 37 (2):167-172.
Pluralism.Joseph W. Evans - 1952 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 27 (4):571-574.
The Conversion of the Norse.Henry Harrington - 1928 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 3 (2):181-199.
Moral Conversion.Walter E. Conn - 1983 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 58 (2):170-187.
Moral Conversion.Walter E. Conn - 1983 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 58 (2):170-187.
The Idea of Conversion.Yves M.-J. Congar - 1958 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 33 (1):5-20.
Saint Ignatius and the “New Theological Age”.William F. Lynch - 1956 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 31 (2):187-215.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
50 (#102,555)

6 months
7 (#1,397,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references