Kant’s Constitutive-Regulative Distinction

The Monist 51 (4):623-639 (1967)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My purposes in this paper are to explain the constitutive-regulative distinction as set out by Kant in the Dialectic and Methodology, and to note its reappearance in contemporary philosophy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Regulative and constitutive.Michael Friedman - 1992 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (S1):73-102.
Comments on Michael Friedman: ‘Regulative and Constitutive’.Robert E. Butts - 1992 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (S1):103-108.
Comments on Michael Friedman: ‘Regulative and Constitutive’.Michael Friedman - 1992 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (Supplement):103-108.
Comments on Michael Friedman: ‘Regulative and Constitutive’.Robert E. Butts - 1992 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (S1):103-108.
Kant on biological teleology: Towards a two-level interpretation.Marcel Quarfood - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (4):735-747.
Purposes and Cross-Purposes.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 2001 - The Monist 84 (3):392-416.
Regulative and reflective uses of purposiveness in Kant.Rudolf A. Makkreel - 1992 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (S1):49-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
98 (#181,199)

6 months
7 (#491,733)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references