Enactivism and the Hegelian Stance on Intrinsic Purposiveness

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 23 (1):155-177 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We characterize Hegel’s stance on biological purposiveness as consisting in a twofold move, which conceives organisms as intrinsically purposive natural systems and focuses on their behavioral and cognitive abilities. We submit that a Hegelian stance is at play in enactivism, the branch of the contemporary theory of biological autonomy devoted to the study of cognition and the mind. What is at stake in the Hegelian stance is the elaboration of a naturalized, although non-reductive, understanding of natural purposiveness.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Organisms as natural purposes: The contemporary evolutionary perspective.D. M. Walsh - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (4):771-791.
Bringing forth a world, literally.Giovanni Rolla & Nara Figueiredo - 2023 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 22 (4):931-953.
Cognition, natural selection and the intentional stance.Daisie Radner & Michael Radner - 1995 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (2):109-19.
Paths of Purposiveness.Majid D. Beni - forthcoming - Biological Theory:1-7.
Not thinking about the same thing. Enactivism, pragmatism and intentionality.Pierre Steiner - forthcoming - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences:1-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-09

Downloads
30 (#519,211)

6 months
12 (#306,613)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Matteo Mossio
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique