Filozofia Nauki 28 (2):25-46 (2020)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.14394/filnau.2020.0008
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,864
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Features of Similarity.Amos Tversky - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (4):327-352.
Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought.Peter Gärdenfors - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (1):180-181.
Vagueness: A Conceptual Spaces Approach.Igor Douven, Lieven Decock, Richard Dietz & Paul Égré - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (1):137-160.
Is There Higher-Order Vagueness?Mark Sainsbury - 1991 - Philosophical Quarterly 41 (163):167-182.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Formalna ocena argumentacji.Marcin Selinger - 2012 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 81 (1):89-109.
Cud rozumienia.Michał Heller - 2011 - Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa 47 (190).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-07-01

Total views
2 ( #1,386,742 of 2,433,136 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #463,753 of 2,433,136 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes