Hare's Impossibilities and the Paradoxicality of Obsessionals

Philosophy 53 (205):395 - 400 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A prolonged professional interest in the problems of obsessional disorder has led me to a consideration of Professor Hare's arguments for prescriptivism. It is perhaps a tribute to the elegance of Hare's argument and the lucidity with which it is presented that the present paper is concerned with the exceptions he cites.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interests and Moral Ideals.R. N. Berki - 1974 - Philosophy 49 (189):265 - 280.
From Universal Prescriptivism to Utilitarianism.James W. McGray - 1986 - Philosophy Research Archives 12:79-86.
Review of R. M. Hare, Sorting out Ethics[REVIEW]Anthony Skelton - 2001 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (4):583-585.
Hare's Prescriptivism.Charles Wei - Hsun Fu - 1971 - NTU Philosophical Review 1:25-62.
Hare's Prescriptivism.Geoffrey Madell - 1965 - Analysis 26 (2):37 - 41.
Hare's Application of Universalizability.Harold J. White - 1969 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):174.
From Universal Prescriptivism to Utilitarianism.James W. McGray - 1986 - Philosophy Research Archives 12 (142):79-86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
3 (#1,729,579)

6 months
16 (#172,419)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Moral weakness.Steven Lukes - 1965 - Philosophical Quarterly 15 (59):104-114.
Weakness of will.Gwynneth Matthews - 1966 - Mind 75 (299):405-419.

Add more references