Freelance Behavioural Scientist

Behavioral and Brain Sciences (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Lankford’s (2013) essential empirical argument, which is based on evidence such as psychological autopsies, is that suicide attacks are caused by suicidality. By operationalizing this causal claim in a hypothetical experiment, I show the claim to be provable, and I contend that its truth is supported by Lankford’s data. However, I question the success of his follow-on arguments about beauty and goodness.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On one of the reasons for the indeterminacy of translation.Alison Jaggar - 1973 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34 (2):257-265.
Norms, Causes, and Alternative Possibilities.Peter Menzies - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):346-347.
Mental Disorder and Suicide: What’s the Connection?Hane Htut Maung - 2022 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 47 (3):345-367.
Epistemic Contextualism: An Idle Hypothesis.John Turri - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (1):141-156.
Empirical Evidence for Rationalism?Joel Pust - 2014 - In Darrell Rowbottom & Anthony Booth (eds.), Intuitions. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-15

Downloads
194 (#106,178)

6 months
44 (#96,617)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian J. Gibbs
University of Chicago (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references