Dharma Morality As Virtue Ethics

Abstract

consequentialism."[2] Whereas it is virtually impossible to do the hedonic calculus for ordinary pains and pleasures, there is no question about the long term good consequences of the virtues and good character, as compared to the long term pain that the vices bring. This means that attempts, such as Michael Slote's gallant.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Gandhi, character consequentialism, and the virtue of nonviolence.Nick Gier - manuscript
Hypocrisy and Consequentialism.Eldon Soifer & Béla Szabados - 1998 - Utilitas 10 (2):168.
Consequentialism and the principle of indifference.Elinor Mason - 2004 - Utilitas 16 (3):316-321.
The Law of Nature as the Moral Law.Bernard Gert - 1988 - Hobbes Studies 1 (1):26-44.
Two kinds of satisficing.Thomas Hurka - 1990 - Philosophical Studies 59 (1):107 - 111.
The Unity and Commensurability of Pleasures and Pains.Ole Martin Moen - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (2):527-543.
Introduction: Virtue and vice.Heather Battaly - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (1-2):1-21.
Slote's Satisficing Consequentialism.Tim Mulgan - 1993 - Ratio 6 (2):121 - 134.
Contemporary Virtue Ethics and Aristotle.Peter Simpson - 1992 - Review of Metaphysics 45 (3):503 - 524.
Introduction: virtue and vice.Heather Battaly - 2010 - In Virtue and Vice, Moral and Epistemic. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 1–20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
68 (#245,700)

6 months
6 (#588,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references