- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Power, Social Transformation, and the New Determinism: A Comment on Grint and Woolgar
Science, Technology and Human Values 21 (3):347-353 (1996)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Reply to Woolgar and Grint: A Preview. [REVIEW]Rob Kling - 1991 - Science, Technology and Human Values 16 (3):379-381.
A Further Decisive Refutation of the Assumption That Political Action Depends on the "Truth" and a Suggestion That We Need to Go beyond This Level of Debate: A Reply to Rosalind Gill.Keith Grint & Steve Woolgar - 1996 - Science, Technology and Human Values 21 (3):354-357.
Computers and the Transformation of Social Analysis.Keith Grint & Steve Woolgar - 1991 - Science, Technology and Human Values 16 (3):368-378.
Transformation: Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1977-1987.Marcel Chotkowski LaFollette - 2022 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 47 (4):636-639.
What Is the Analysis of Scientific Rhetoric for? A Comment on the Possible Convergence Between Rhetorical Analysis and Social Studies of Science.Steve Woolgar - 1989 - Science, Technology and Human Values 14 (1):47-49.
Turn, Turn, and Turn Again: The Woolgar Formula.Trevor Pinch - 1993 - Science, Technology and Human Values 18 (4):511-522.
New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity Rosalind Gill and Christina Scharff (eds). [REVIEW]Kaye Mitchell - 2013 - Feminist Theory 14 (3):361-363.
Power, Social Structure, and Advice in American Science: The United States National Advisory System, 1950-1972.Nicholas C. Mullins - 1981 - Science, Technology and Human Values 6 (4):4-19.
Social Responsibility in Science: the New Zealand Association of Scientists.Rosemary A. Chalk - 1979 - Science, Technology and Human Values 4 (3):11-16.
Captives and Victims: Comment on Scott, Richards, and Martin.H. M. Collins - 1991 - Science, Technology and Human Values 16 (2):249-251.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-11-27
Downloads
8 (#1,345,183)
6 months
8 (#415,230)
2020-11-27
Downloads
8 (#1,345,183)
6 months
8 (#415,230)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge.Michael Lynch - 2000 - Theory, Culture and Society 17 (3):26-54.
Ethics in Technological Culture: A Programmatic Proposal for a Pragmatist Approach.Tsjalling Swierstra, Michiel Korthals, Maartje Schermer & Jozef Keulartz - 2004 - Science, Technology and Human Values 29 (1):3-29.
A Further Decisive Refutation of the Assumption That Political Action Depends on the "Truth" and a Suggestion That We Need to Go beyond This Level of Debate: A Reply to Rosalind Gill.Keith Grint & Steve Woolgar - 1996 - Science, Technology and Human Values 21 (3):354-357.
The Womb as Operation Room: Feminist Technology Studies without “Failures of Nerve”.Hans Harbers - 2003 - Science, Technology and Human Values 28 (3):425-434.
References found in this work
Principled positions: postmodernism and the rediscovery of value.Judith Squires (ed.) - 1993 - London: Lawrence & Wishart.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-dxklk uwo