A Suggested Change In The Informed Consent Procedure

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (2):258-260 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Informed consent began as a way of protecting physicians against legal liability. It did so by requiring physicians to provide their patients with sufficient information so that the patients could assent to or withhold consent from a proffered medical treatment. It was also intended to be an accurate expression of the patient's wishes. As such, it established the conditions by which a patient could be held responsible for his decisions concerning medical treatment.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Informed Consent: Good Medicine, Dangerous Side Effects.Bruce N. Waller & Robyn A. Repko - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (1):66-74.
The Legal Development of the Informed Consent Doctrine: Past and Present.Janet L. Dolgin - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (1):97.
Barriers To Informed Consent In Japan.Atsushi Asai - 1996 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 6 (4):91-93.
Paying for informed consent.A. Akabayashi - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (3):212-213.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
12 (#1,093,652)

6 months
2 (#1,446,987)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references