Essentiality and Theoretical Identifications: Reply to Ahmed

Mind 118 (469):135-148 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In reply to Arif Ahmed, I argue that the apparatus of essentiality and qualified and unqualified possibilist identifications, developed in my paper 'Rigidity and Essentiality', can be used to provide a flawless reconstruction of several Kripkean ideas about the semantics of typical natural kind predicates, the essence of natural kinds, the contingency of usual descriptive identifications, and the arguments against psychophysical identity theories



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rigidity and Essentiality.M. Gómez-Torrente - 2006 - Mind 115 (1):227--59.
Reply to Ahmed.Lee Walters - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (1pt1):123-133.
Psychophysical and Theoretical Identifications.David K. Lewis - 1972 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):249-258.
On Theoretical Identifications.G. W. Fitch - 2001 - Noûs 35 (s15):379 - 392.
Physicalism and Classical Theism.Peter Forrest - 1996 - Faith and Philosophy 13 (2):179-200.
Reply to Ahmed.Bob Hale - 2000 - Mind 109 (433):93-96.
Ideas in Theoretical Biology.E. Ahmed - 1998 - Acta Biotheoretica 46 (2):167-168.


Added to PP

24 (#476,530)

6 months
1 (#413,740)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mario Gomez-Torrente
National Autonomous University of Mexico

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references