On field's argument for substantivalism

Abstract
In this article I subject to criticism Field's argument, according to which field theory takes space-time to be substance since it ascribes field properties to space-time points. There is petitio principii error made in this reasoning because Field does not give any justification for his controversial assumption that fields are properties of space-time points. What is more, I suggest, Field's interpretation of field theory is incompatible with the way this theory is understood and utilized by its users, namely scientists. My criticism is based on the assumption that one cannot propose an ontology of a given scientific theory, at the same time imposing on it an interpretation which clashes with the interpretation current among its users. I also suggest that in order to establish the ontology of a scientific theory one should also take into account the way it has been constructed. According to this criterion, field theory does indeed take space-time to be a substance.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02698599908573604
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,205
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Science Without Numbers.Hartry Field - 1980 - Princeton University Press.
The Ways of Paradox, and Other Essays.W. V. Quine - 1966 - Harvard University Press.
What Price Spacetime Substantivalism? The Hole Story.John Earman & John Norton - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4):515-525.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
On Quantitative Relationist Theories.Brent Mundy - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (4):582-600.
On Being Twice as Heavy.David Liggins - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (2):203-7.
Distant Action in Classical Electromagnetic Theory.Brent Mundy - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (1):39-68.
Interpretations of Quantum Field Theory.Nick Huggett & Robert Weingard - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (3):370-388.
Against Field Interpretations of Quantum Field Theory.David Baker - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):585-609.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

23 ( #214,591 of 2,154,159 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #398,005 of 2,154,159 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums