Malebranche on the passions: Biology, morality and the fall
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (2):191 – 207 (2010)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstractDOI
10.1080/09608781003643527
My notes
Similar books and articles
Malebranche and Leibniz on the best of all possible worlds.Tad M. Schmaltz - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):28-48.
Malebranche: Divinity, Responsibility, and Control of the Passions.Nathaniel Bowditch - 2010 - International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (3):363-382.
Reason, Morality, and Hume’s “Active Principles”: Comments on Rachel Cohon’s Hume’s Morality: Feeling and Fabrication.Elizabeth S. Radcliffe - 2008 - Hume Studies 34 (2):267-276.
Malebranche's natural theodicy and the incompleteness of God's volitions.Andrew Pessin - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (1):47-63.
Causality and Human Freedom in Malebranche.Fred Ablondi - 1996 - Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):321-331.
Biology intersects religion and morality.Kevin J. Sharpe - 1992 - Biology and Philosophy 7 (1):77-88.
Malebranche and Ideas.Treatise on Nature and Grace.Steven M. Nadler - 1992 - Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-05-07
Downloads
85 (#145,607)
6 months
1 (#449,220)
2010-05-07
Downloads
85 (#145,607)
6 months
1 (#449,220)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
17th and 18th century theories of emotions.Amy Morgan Schmitter - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Our Body Is the Measure: Malebranche and the Body-Relativity of Sensory Perception.Colin Chamberlain - forthcoming - Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy.
Self-Love or Diffidence? Malebranche and Hume on the Love of Fame.Alison McIntyre & Julie Walsh - 2022 - Journal of Modern Philosophy 4 (1):2.
