Bring ART into the ACT

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):610-611 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ACT is compared with a particular type of connectionist model that cannot handle symbols and use nonbiological operations which do not learn in real time. This focus continues an unfortunate trend of straw man debates in cognitive science. Adaptive Resonance Theory, or ART-neural models of cognition can handle both symbols and subsymbolic representations, and meet the Newell criteria at least as well as connectionist models.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conceptions and misconceptions of connectionism.Ron Sun - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):621-621.
Connectionist models learn what?Timothy van Gelder - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):509-510.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
15 (#244,896)

6 months
5 (#1,552,255)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Grossberg
Boston University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references