The Wishful Thinking Problem for Non-cognitivism: Does It Really Make Sense?

Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 28 (1):30-44 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper concerns the Wishful Thinking Problem for non-cognitivism, which has recently been raised by Cian Dorr. Contrary to Dorr’s claim that the Wishful Thinking Problem is a new crucial objection to non-cognitivism in addition to the well-known Frege-Geach Problem, I argue that recent research has shown that the Wishful Thinking Problem is not independent of the Frege-Geach Problem and therefore it is not lethal to non-cognitivism. However, the Wishful Thinking Problem is still a problem for non-cognitivism, for it reveals that the Frege-Geach Problem may be even more troublesome than non-cognitivists originally thought.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are expressivists guilty of wishful thinking?Robert Mabrito - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):1069-1081.
Non-cognitivism and rational inference.Mark Bryant Budolfson - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (2):243 - 259.
The Frege–Geach problem and Kalderon's moral fictionalism.Matti Eklund - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):705-712.
Normative uncertainty for non-cognitivists.Andrew Sepielli - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (2):191-207.
XIV—Moral Non‐Cognitivism and the Grammar of Morality.Michael Blome‐Tillmann - 2009 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt3):279-309.
Non‐cognitivism and Wishful Thinking.Cian Dorr - 2002 - Noûs 36 (1):97–103.
Habermas's Moral Cognitivism and the Frege‐Geach Challenge.James Gordon Finlayson - 2005 - European Journal of Philosophy 13 (3):319-344.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-19

Downloads
48 (#341,080)

6 months
14 (#200,872)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Chengying Guan
King's College London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations