Pragmatics and Cognition 14 (2):293-311 (2006)
AbstractIs cognition an exclusive property of the individual or can groups have a mind of their own? We explore this question from the perspective of complex adaptive systems. One of the principal insights from this line of work is that rules that govern behavior at one level of analysis can cause qualitatively different behavior at higher levels. We review a number of behavioral studies from our lab that demonstrate how groups of people interacting in real-time can self-organize into adaptive, problem-solving group structures. A number of principles are derived concerning the critical features of such “distributed” information processing systems. We suggest that while cognitive science has traditionally focused on the individual, cognitive processes may manifest at many levels including the emergent group-level behavior that results from the interaction of multiple agents and their environment.
Similar books and articles
Thinking in groups.Todd M. Gureckis & Robert L. Goldstone - 2006 - Pragmatics and Cognition 14 (2):293-311.
Logarithmic Descriptions of Whitehead Groups and Class Groups for $p$-Groups.Robert Oliver, Larry Taylor & Laurence R. Taylor - 1988 - American Mathematical Soc..
Pupils ’Age and Philosophical Praxis: Two Factors that Influence the Development of Critical Thinking in Children‘.Marie-France Daniel & Mathieu Gagnon - 2012 - Childhood and Philosophy 8 (15):105-130.
Correlative Language and "Tui lei" of Correlative Thinking.Ke-xi Wang - 2010 - Philosophy and Culture 37 (8):107-122.
The Superiority of 'Chemical Thinking' for Understanding Free Human Society According to Hegel.Mark Nowacki & Wilfried Ver Eecke - unknown
Tarski's problem for varieties of groups with a commutator identity.John Lawrence - 1986 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (1):75-78.
Hyperlinear and sofic groups: a brief guide.Vladimir G. Pestov - 2008 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (4):449-480.
Implicit measurement of positive and negative future thinking as a predictor of depressive symptoms and hopelessness.Liv Kosnes, Robert Whelan, Aoife O’Donovan & Louise A. McHugh - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (3):898-912.
The effect of the internal structure of categories on perception.Todd M. Gureckis & Robert L. Goldstone - 2008 - In B. C. Love, K. McRae & V. M. Sloutsky (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society. pp. 1876--1881.
Critical Thinking: Reflection and Perspective Part II.Robert Ennis - 2011 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 26 (2):5-19.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Bayesian collective learning emerges from heuristic social learning.P. M. Krafft, Erez Shmueli, Thomas L. Griffiths, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Alex “Sandy” Pentland - 2021 - Cognition 212 (C):104469.
How to share a mind: Reconsidering the group mind thesis.Thomas Szanto - 2014 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (1):99-120.
Collective Behavior.Robert L. Goldstone & Todd M. Gureckis - 2009 - Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (3):412-438.
Is Distributed Cognition Group level Cognition?Kirk Ludwig - 2015 - Journal of Social Ontology 1 (2):189-224.
Cognitive Artifacts for Geometric Reasoning.Mateusz Hohol & Marcin Miłkowski - 2019 - Foundations of Science 24 (4):657-680.
References found in this work
No references found.