Cicero, Brutus 304–5

Classical Quarterly 18 (2):412-413 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In an otherwise convincing article Mr. T. P. Wiseman argues that this passage ‘seems to mean that L. Memmius and Q. Pompeius were principes, i.e. outstanding orators, and that they were not among those who spoke in their own defence in 90 B.C.’. But he rightly refuses to believe that Cicero can have intended this, since, apart from other considerations, it is clear from Cicero's previous references to Memmius and Pompeius that he did not consider them to be outstanding orators.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cicero, Brutus 304–5.J. R. Hamilton - 1968 - Classical Quarterly 18 (02):412-.
Cicero's Philosophy of History.Matthew Fox - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Cicero and Editorial Revision.Sean Gurd - 2007 - Classical Antiquity 26 (1):49-80.
Cicero, Brutus.J. W. Spaeth - 1941 - Classical Weekly 35:66-67.
Cicero: Brutus. [REVIEW]A. E. Douglas - 1973 - The Classical Review 23 (2):181-182.
When did Livius Andronicus come to Rome?W. Beare - 1940 - Classical Quarterly 34 (1-2):11-.
The Lex Thoria And Cicero, Brutus 136.J. S. M. Willcock - 1982 - Classical Quarterly 32 (2):474-475.
Cicero, Brutus 136.Robin Seager - 1967 - The Classical Review 17 (01):12-13.
The Lex Thoria And Cicero, Brutus 136.J. S. M. Willcock - 1982 - Classical Quarterly 32 (02):474-.
New Texts of Cicero's Brutus and Orator. [REVIEW]G. B. A. Fletcher - 1935 - The Classical Review 49 (4):141-142.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
8 (#1,315,307)

6 months
2 (#1,192,898)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references