Journal of Medical Ethics 12 (1):13-17 (1986)
AbstractThe McNaughton Rules, which are used when someone pleads insanity at the time of a homicide, are out of date and unsatisfactory. Suggestions have been made about how the insanity defence can be reformulated. The preference of a defence of diminished responsibility means abandoning an ancient and humane principle of not convicting those who are so mentally disordered as not to be responsible for their actions. There is a need for Parliament to consider changes to the law both to prevent the mentally disordered being sent to prison inappropriately, and because the Mental Health Act 1983 has not taken account of rare cases where an offender such as an epileptic might be found legally insane but not mentally disordered
Similar books and articles
Beyond Rational Insanity.Hung-Yul So - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:221-227.
Failed Agency and the Insanity Defence.Steve Matthews - 2004 - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 27:413-424.
Insanity and Responsibility.Herbert Fingarette - 1972 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 15 (1-4):6 – 29.
Reflections on Medicine, Biotechnology, and the Law.Zelman Cowen - 1985 - the University of Nebraska Press.
Biomedical Science: Law & Practice: From R & D to Market.Zaid Hamzah - 2007 - Sweet & Maxwell Asia.
Genetic Privacy and Discrimination: An Overview of Selected Major Issues.Eugene Oscapella - 2012 - Bc Civil Liberties Association.
The Insanity Plea: Szaszian Ethics and Epistemology.Lee S. Weinberg & Richard E. Vatz - 1982 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 3 (3):417-433.
Wild Beasts and Idle Humours: The Insanity Defense From Antiquity to the Present.Daniel N. Robinson - 1996 - Harvard Univ. Press.
International Survey of Laws on Assisted Procreation.Jan Stepan (ed.) - 1990 - Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads