Philosophy of Science 64 (4):116 (1997)
The relationship between economics and the philosophy of natural science has changed substantially during the last few years. What was once exclusively a one-way relationship from philosophy to economics now seems to be much closer to bilateral exchange. The purpose of this paper is to examine this new relationship. First, I document the change. Second, I examine the situation within contemporary philosophy of science in order to explain why economics might have its current appeal. Third, I consider some of the issues that might jeopardize the success of this philosophical project
|Keywords||Economics of Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Diversity and the Division of Cognitive Labor.Ryan Muldoon - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (2):117-125.
Economic Methodology is Dead - Long Live Economic Methodology: Thirteen Theses on the New Economic Methodology.D. Wade Hands - 2001 - Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (1):49-63.
Economics of Science: Survey and Suggestions.Esther-Mirjam Sent - 1999 - Journal of Economic Methodology 6 (1):95-124.
Similar books and articles
Economics: Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns?Alexander Rosenberg - 1992 - University of Chicago Press.
How to Do Philosophy of Economics.Daniel M. Hausman - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:353 - 362.
Blurred Boundaries: Recent Changes in the Relationship Between Economics and the Philosophy of Natural Science.D. Wade Hands - 1994 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (5):751-772.
What Economics is Not: An Economist's Response to Rosenberg.Douglas W. Hands - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (3):495-503.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads134 ( #33,418 of 2,143,475 )
Recent downloads (6 months)25 ( #12,650 of 2,143,475 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.