- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
An annotation scheme for Rhetorical Figures
Argument and Computation 9 (2):155-175 (2018)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Rhetorical figures, arguments, computation.Randy Allen Harris & Chrysanne Di Marco - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (3):211-231.
Book review: Rhetoric and incommensurability, Randy Allen Harris (Ed.). [REVIEW]Struan Jacobs - 2008 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (1):100-103.
Harnessing rhetorical figures for argument mining.John Lawrence, Jacky Visser & Chris Reed - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (3):289-310.
Rhetorical figures as argument schemes – The proleptic suite.Ashley Rose Mehlenbacher - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (3):233-252.
Ontological representations of rhetorical figures for argument mining.Jelena Mitrović, Cliff O’Reilly, Miljana Mladenović & Siegfried Handschuh - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (3):267-287.
Rhetorical strategies in German argumentative dialogs.Annette Hautli-Janisz & Mennatallah El-Assady - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (2):153-174.
The argumentative and rhetorical function of multimodal metonymy.Andrea Rocci, Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati & Chiara Pollaroli - 2018 - Semiotica 2018 (220):123-153.
Building a corpus of legal argumentation in Japanese judgement documents: towards structure-based summarisation.Hiroaki Yamada, Simone Teufel & Takenobu Tokunaga - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 27 (2):141-170.
Marco Giunti, Computation, Dynamics and Cognition. [REVIEW]D. V. Newman - 1998 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 5 (2):246-246.
Annotating Argument Schemes.Jacky Visser, John Lawrence, Chris Reed, Jean Wagemans & Douglas Walton - 2020 - Argumentation 35 (1):101-139.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-07-25
Downloads
29 (#537,508)
6 months
12 (#306,076)
2018-07-25
Downloads
29 (#537,508)
6 months
12 (#306,076)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Recognizing rhetoric in science policy arguments.Nancy L. Green - 2020 - Argument and Computation 11 (3):257-268.
Argumentation schemes: From genetics to international relations to environmental science policy to AI ethics.Nancy L. Green - 2021 - Argument and Computation 12 (3):397-416.
The use of antithesis and other contrastive relations in argumentation.Nancy L. Green - 2023 - Argument and Computation 14 (1):1-16.
References found in this work
Rhetorical figures as argument schemes – The proleptic suite.Ashley Rose Mehlenbacher - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (3):233-252.
Rhetorical figures, arguments, computation.Randy Allen Harris & Chrysanne Di Marco - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (3):211-231.
Representation of Argumentation in Text with Rhetorical Structure Theory.Nancy L. Green - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (2):181-196.
Harnessing rhetorical figures for argument mining.John Lawrence, Jacky Visser & Chris Reed - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (3):289-310.
Figural Logic in Gregor Mendel's “Experiments on Plant Hybrids”.Randy Harris - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):570-602.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-kkm7k uwo