Reliability and novelty: Information gain in multi-level selection systems [Book Review]

Erkenntnis 46 (3):335-363 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Information about the environment is captured in human biological systems on a variety of interacting levels – in distributions of genes, linguistic particulars, concepts, methods, theories, preferences, and overt behaviors. I investigate some of the basic principles which govern such a hierarchy by constructing a comparatively simple three-level selection model of bee foraging preferences and behaviors. The information-theoretic notion of ''''mutual information'''' is employed as a measure of efficiency in tracking a changing environment, and its appropriateness in epistemological applications is discussed at some length. In particular, information accumulated in mid-level preference distributions exhibits suggestive properties for the purposes of naturalistic epistemology. It also appears that the novelty of scientific objects and representations and the rapidity of scientific change relative to genetic change need present no obstacle to the use of such models in explanations of scientific progress and the reliability of scientific judgement.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Altruism, group selection and correlated interaction.Samir Okasha - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):703-725.
The transition to civilization and symbolically stored genomes.Jon Beach - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (1):109-141.
Reliability of information on the internet: Some distinctions.Anton Vedder & Robert Wachbroit - 2003 - Ethics and Information Technology 5 (4):211-215.
The Units of Selection and the Structure of the Multi-Level Genome.William C. Wimsatt - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:122 - 183.
The Information Medium.Orlin Vakarelov - 2012 - Philosophy and Technology 25 (1):47-65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#305,270)

6 months
17 (#146,837)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William F. Harms
Seattle Central Community College

Citations of this work

Evolutionary epistemology.Michael Bradie - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Adaptation and moral realism.William F. Harms - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (5):699-712.
Extended Mechanistic Explanations: Expanding the Current Mechanistic Conception to Include More Complex Biological Systems.Sarah M. Roe & Bert Baumgaertner - 2017 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 48 (4):517-534.
The use of information theory in epistemology.William F. Harms - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (3):472-501.
What Is Information? Three Concepts.William F. Harms - 2006 - Biological Theory 1 (3):230-242.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature.Peter Godfrey-Smith (ed.) - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Biosemantics.Ruth Millikan - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (6):281--297.
Biosemantics.Ruth Millikan - 2009 - In Brian McLaughlin, Ansgar Beckermann & Sven Walter (eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mind. Oxford University Press.
Indication and adaptation.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 1992 - Synthese 92 (2):283-312.

View all 7 references / Add more references