Philosophical Studies 114 (1-2):173 - 198 (2003)
Many people face a problem about potentiality: their moral beliefs appear to dictate inconsistent views about the signiﬁcance of the potentiality to become a healthy adult. Brieﬂy, the problem arises as follows. Consider the following two claims. First, both human babies and cats have moral status, but harms to babies matter more, morally, than similar harms to cats. Second, early human embryos lack moral status. It appears that the ﬁrst claim can only be true if human babies have more moral status than cats. Among the properties that determine moral status, human babies have no properties other than their potentiality that could explain their having more moral status than cats. So human babies’ potentiality to become adult persons must explain their having more moral status than cats. But then potentiality must raise moral status generally. So early human embryos must have some moral status. It appears that the view that must underlie the ﬁrst claim implies that the second claim is false.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Epistemology Logic Philosophy of Mind Philosophy of Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Can We Harm and Benefit in Creating?Elizabeth Harman - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):89–113.
Human-Animal Chimeras: Human Dignity, Moral Status, and Species Prejudice.David Degrazia - 2007 - Metaphilosophy 38 (2-3):309–329.
Sacred Mountains and Beloved Fetuses: Can Loving or Worshipping Something Give It Moral Status?Elizabeth Harman - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (1):55-81.
How is the Ethics of Stem Cell Research Different From the Ethics of Abortion?Elizabeth Harman - 2007 - Metaphilosophy 38 (2-3):207–225.
Persons, Dolphins, and Human–Nonhuman Chimeras.David DeGrazia - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (2):17-18.
Similar books and articles
Confronting Deep Moral Disagreement: The President's Council on Bioethics, Moral Status, and Human Embryos.Lawrence J. Nelson & Michael J. Meyer - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):33 – 42.
Moral Status as a Matter of Degree?David DeGrazia - 2008 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):181-198.
Stem Cell Research, Personhood and Sentience.Lisa Bortolotti & John Harris - 2005 - Reproductive Biomedicine Online 10:68-75.
Stem Cell Research and the Problem of Embryonic Identity.Phillip Montague - 2011 - Journal of Ethics 15 (4):307-319.
Researchers and Firing Squads: Questions Concerning the Use of Frozen Human Embryos.P. Tully - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (5):516-528.
Must We Have Full Moral Status Throughout Our Existence? A Reply to Alfonso Gomez-Lobo.David DeGrazia - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (4):297-310.
On Potentiality and Respect for Embryos: A Reply to Mary Mahowald.Alfonso Gómez-Lobo - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (2):105-110.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads143 ( #31,810 of 2,152,250 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #89,723 of 2,152,250 )
How can I increase my downloads?