Confessions of a Shoveler: STS Subcultures and Engineering Ethics

Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 26 (5):410-418 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mainstream science, technology, and society scholars have shown little interest in engineering ethics, one going so far as to label engineering ethics activists as “shit shovelers.” Detachment from engineering ethics on the part of most STS scholars is related to a broader and long-standing split between the scholar-oriented and activist-oriented wings of STS. This article discusses the various STS “subcultures” and argues that the much-maligned activist STS subculture is far more likely than the mainstream scholar subculture to have a significant impact on engineering ethics education and practice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Editorial: Ethics and Engineering Design.Peter-Paul Verbeek & Ibo van de Poel - 2006 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 31 (3):223-236.
STS at Michigan Technological University: A History and Profile.Terry S. Reynolds - 1999 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 19 (1):49-50.
On sprague’s “The voice of experience”.Taft H. Broome - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (1):45-50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-27

Downloads
7 (#1,411,895)

6 months
2 (#1,259,919)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Bridging the Gap?Colin Salter - 2009 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 29 (4):298-307.

Add more citations