Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies

Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):403-414 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Three frames of reference for engineering ethics are discussed—individual, professional and social—which can be further broken down into “microethics” concerned with individuals and the internal relations of the engineering profession and “macroethics” referring to the collective social responsibility of the engineering profession and to societal decisions about technology. Few attempts have been made at integrating microethical and macroethical approaches to engineering ethics. The approach suggested here is to focus on the role of professional engineering societies in linking individual and professional ethics and in linking professional and social ethics. A research program is outlined using ethics support as an example of the former, and the issuance of position statements on product liability as an example of the latter.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

102 (#171,391)

6 months
15 (#168,092)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Thinking like an engineer.Michael Davis - 2018 - In Nicholas Sakellariou & Rania Milleron (eds.), Ethics, Politics, and Whistleblowing in Engineering. Boca Raton, FL: Crc Press.
Engineering Practice and Engineering Ethics.Ronald Kline & William T. Lynch - 2000 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 25 (2):195-225.
Ethical Responsibilities of Engineers in Large Organizations.Richard T. De George - 1981 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 1 (1):1-14.

Add more references