We belong together? A plea for modesty in modal plural logic

Abstract

It is often assumed that pluralities are rigid, in the sense of having all and only their actual members necessarily. This assumption is operative in standard approaches to modal plural logic. I argue that a sceptical approach towards the assumption is warranted.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Quantified Modal Logic and the Plural De Re.Phillip Bricker - 1989 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 14 (1):372-394.
Modalising Plurals.Simon Thomas Hewitt - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (5):853-875.
Logic and Plurals.Salvatore Florio & Øystein Linnebo - 2018 - In Kirk Ludwig & Marija Jankovic (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Collective Intentionality. Routledge. pp. 451-463.
Plural quantification exposed.Øystein Linnebo - 2003 - Noûs 37 (1):71–92.
Reply to Linnebo.Timothy Williamson - 2016 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (4-5):677-682.
Modal set theory.Christopher Menzel - 2018 - In Otávio Bueno & Scott A. Shalkowski (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Modality. New York: Routledge.
Is modal logic logic?Gilbert Harman - 1972 - Philosophia 2 (1-2):75-84.
Plurals and modals.Øystein Linnebo - 2016 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (4-5):654-676.
Modality, si! Modal logic, no!John Mccarthy - 1997 - Studia Logica 59 (1):29-32.
Plural quantification.Ø Linnebo - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A New Introduction to Modal Logic.M. J. Cresswell & G. E. Hughes - 1996 - New York: Routledge. Edited by M. J. Cresswell.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-06

Downloads
423 (#46,326)

6 months
88 (#53,706)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Simon Hewitt
University of Leeds

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations