The Unity of Science

In W. H. Newton‐Smith (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 540–549 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We live together in one natural, if complex, world, and our scientific knowledge of it ought to be correspondingly unified. But currently the sciences collectively form a very complex structure, partly interrelated, partly unrelated, and partly incompatible. How is this condition explained, and what may we expect of unity in science?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The unity of science.Martin Carrier & Jürgen Mittelstrass - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (1):17-31.
Marx and the Unity of Science - Natural and Social.B. M. Kedrov - 1968 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 7 (2):3-14.
Sobre la unidad de las ciencias biológicas.Pablo Lorenzano - 2001 - Signos Filosóficos 3 (5):121-131.
Unity of Science.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2021 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sobre la unidad de las ciencias biológicas.Pablo Lorenzano - 2001 - Signos Filosóficos 5:121-131.
The Plurality of Science.Patrick Suppes - 1978 - PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978 (2):2-16.
Newman on the Problem of the Partiality and Unity of the Sciences.Michael Baur - 2003 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:111-127.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-15

Downloads
1 (#1,902,993)

6 months
1 (#1,475,085)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references