Animal advocacy, fear and loathing in academia: a response to Helena Pedersen

Ethics and Education 16 (2):178-181 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT Helena Pedersen’s powerful keynote address poses the question: What prevents education from becoming a transformative force in times of ‘omnicide’, that is, ‘the annihilation of everything’? She locates at least part of the response in ‘institutional anxiety’, which constitutes a psychological barrier to radical change. In particular, she discusses anxiety related to the moral standing of non-human animals as a threat to human exceptionalism in educational practice and research. Institutional anxiety, as I show in my discussion of a recent manifestation at a university in South Africa, also occurs in post-liberation societies, when ‘university teachers confront’ or consider confronting ‘their own colleagues with requests for deconstruction of the anthropocentric infrastructure of their own workplace’, colleagues they know to have been historically marginalised or disenfranchised. However, as I hope to make clear in my response, there are some ways of confrontation that are less divisive than others.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-09

Downloads
18 (#201,463)

6 months
5 (#1,552,255)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kai Horsthemke
Katholische Universität Eichstätt

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Animals and African Ethics.Kai Horsthemke - 2017 - Journal of Animal Ethics 7 (2):119-144.
Animals and African ethics.Kai Horsthemke - 2015 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Add more references