The ontology of artefacts: the hard problem

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (1):118-131 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We examine to what extent an adequate ontology of technical artefacts can be based on existing general accounts of the relation between higher-order objects and their material basis. We consider two of these accounts: supervenience and constitution. We take as our starting point the thesis that artefacts have a ‘dual nature’, that is, that they are both material bodies and functional objects. We present two criteria for an adequate ontology of artefacts, ‘Underdetermination’ and ‘Realizability Constraints’ , which address aspects of the dual nature thesis. Assessing supervenience accounts, we find them either wanting with respect to these criteria or insufficiently informative. Next, we argue that a recent application of Lynne Rudder Baker’s constitution view to artefacts cannot meet our criteria, although the broader view leaves room for improvement. Based on our evaluation of the most promising candidates, we conclude that so far general metaphysical views fail to address the most salient features of artefacts. Although they can account for the fact that artefacts have a ‘dual nature’, they do not offer the conceptual resources needed to describe the relation between these natures; this relation raises a hard problem in metaphysics.Keywords: Metaphysics; Artefact; Supervenience; Constitution; Underdetermination

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,484

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Artefacts in Analytic Metaphysics.Wybo Houkes & Pieter E. Vermaas - 2009 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 13 (2):74-81.
What Do Technical Functions Supervene On?Martin Peterson - 2022 - Techné Research in Philosophy and Technology 26 (3):413-425.
Produced to Use.Wybo Houkes & Pieter E. Vermaas - 2009 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 13 (2):123-136.
A formal ontology of artefacts.Gilles Kassel - 2010 - Applied ontology 5 (3-4):223-246.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
86 (#209,638)

6 months
6 (#694,848)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anthonie Meijers
Eindhoven University of Technology

References found in this work

The ontology of artifacts.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2004 - Philosophical Explorations 7 (2):99 – 111.
Actions Versus Functions.Wybo Houkes & Pieter Vermaas - 2004 - The Monist 87 (1):52-71.
The normativity of artefacts.Maarten Franssen - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (1):42-57.
Knowledge of artefact functions.Wybo Houkes - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (1):102-113.

View all 6 references / Add more references