Philosophy of Science 64 (4):126 (1997)

An invisible hand seems to play an important role in science. In this paper I set out the general structure of invisible-hand explanations, counter some objections that have been raised to them, and detail the role that they play in science. The most important issue is the character of the mechanisms that are supposed to bring about invisible-hand effects
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/392592
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,219
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Credit Incentive to Be a Maverick.Remco Heesen - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 76:5-12.
Group Inquiry.Joshua Habgood-Coote - forthcoming - Erkenntnis.
Policing Epistemic Communities.Justin P. Bruner - 2013 - Episteme 10 (4):403-416.
Moral Trust & Scientific Collaboration.Karen Frost-Arnold - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):301-310.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
128 ( #83,043 of 2,448,425 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #304,192 of 2,448,425 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes