Criminal Law and Philosophy 14 (3):381-393 (2020)

Authors
Douglas Husak
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Abstract
I describe how our understanding of some of the central principles long held dear by most criminal theorists may have to be interpreted in light of the need to devise lenient responses for low-level offenders. Several of the most plausible suggestions for how to deal with minor infractions force us to take seriously some ideas that many legal philosophers have tended to resist elsewhere. I briefly touch upon four topics: whether informal can substitute for or count against the appropriate state sanction; the significance of repeat offending for sentencing; whether punishment for culpable public wrongdoing has intrinsic value; and the scope of police powers in a liberal democratic state. The context for this discussion is R. A. Duff’s insightful examination of whether and under what conditions we should criminalize a public wrong or respond to it in some other manner.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11572-019-09505-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,587
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Philosophy of Criminal Law.Douglas Husak - 1987 - Rowman & Littlefield.
Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content? [REVIEW]Douglas Husak - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):99-122.
The Orthodox Model of the Criminal Offense.Douglas N. Husak - 1991 - Criminal Justice Ethics 10 (1):20-23.
Motive and Criminal Liability.Douglas N. Husak - 1989 - Criminal Justice Ethics 8 (1):3-14.
Editorial.Antony Duff, Claire Grant, Douglas Husak, Ronnie Lippens & Matt Matravers - 2007 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1):1-3.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-08-28

Total views
10 ( #882,207 of 2,461,980 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,803 of 2,461,980 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes