In Philosophy and Human Existence, Saarbrucken, German, LAP Lambert Academic Publishing AG & Co. KG. pp 86-111. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing Saarbrucken, German, AG & Co. KG.. pp. 86-111. (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Man, in the Heraclitean principle of change, is an embodiment of continuity and discontinuity. To what end man’s being transcends to, is an interrogative of important discourse in this paper. Does Man flux from life to death; in nothingness, and from death, in nothingness, to life in somethingness? What does it mean to be human, to die and to experience change and human transcendence? The frequent nature of death, the death of loved ones, colleagues and friends elicit lamentations and sorrows, but more importantly, it expresses human incapacity, fear of the unknown, lack of knowledge of death, and of what it means to die. Such attitude or confusion, may have informed the interrogative of Job (14:14): If man dies shall he live again? It also agitates the triad; if a man lives to die, does he die to live? If God is life, is God death also? If life is a means to an end, is death the end? (Adadevo, 2008; 38). These interrogatives exemplify the character and paradox of human existence; the more the knowledge of man about man, the more Man understands that he knows little about his being. It is argued here that, as a being that encapsulate change, discontinuity and continuity, man’s dissolution in death is not an external and public fact that creates a sense of loss and sadness to humanity, but an internal possibility of his being. It is the fulfillment of the Man project of self-liberation, self-transcendence, and a process of surpassing Man’s existential condition. We shall argue further that, in death, man ceases to be the impersonal social being among beings and has freed himself from the servitude of the anonymous “they” and thereby opened himself to his own most potentiality for being. In birth, there is the change of non-being to being, of nothingness to somethingness (somaticity), then to pure being after death; to a spiritual reality. A conclusion is argued that, in death, Man further becomes the most vitalizing fact of life and the cardinal indicator of authentic selfhood.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

To Die With Others.Alphonso Lingis - 2000 - Diacritics 30 (3):106-113.
A New argumentation about the Life after Death.Amir Divani - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 19 (74):46-67.
The Perception of Human Being in al-Māturīdī.Osman Nuri Demir - 2019 - ULUM Journal of Religious Inquiries 2 (1):187-191.
Fear of Death on the Basis of Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra''''s View.Fatima Sulaymani - 2008 - Avicennian Philosophy Journal 12 (40):75-101.
Fear of Death on the Basis of Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra's View.Fatima Sulaymani - 2009 - Avicennian Philosophy Journal 13 (41):75-101.
Franz Rosenzweig's philosophy of existence: an analysis of The star of redemption.Else Freund - 1979 - Higham, MA: distribution for the U.S. and Canada, Kluwer Boston. Edited by Paul R. Mendes-Flohr.


Added to PP

212 (#98,362)

6 months
43 (#108,467)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alloy Ihuah
University of Lagos (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references