Descartes’ Ontological Argument: A Causal Argument

New Scholasticism 45 (2):348-351 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00286621

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Descartes’ Ontological Argument as Non-Causal.James M. Humber - 1970 - New Scholasticism 44 (3):449-459.
Descartes’ Ontological Argument.Robert A. Imlay - 1969 - New Scholasticism 43 (3):440-448.
The Ontological Argument.R. J. Connelly - 1969 - New Scholasticism 43 (4):530-554.
Descartes’ Unsound Argument.Russell A. Lascola - 1978 - New Scholasticism 52 (1):41-53.
Descartes’ Unsound Argument.Russell A. Lascola - 1978 - New Scholasticism 52 (1):41-53.
The Negative Ontological Argument.Michael P. Slattery - 1969 - New Scholasticism 43 (4):614-617.
Analogy and the Ontological Argument.Roger Duncan - 1980 - New Scholasticism 54 (1):25-33.
Is the Cartesian Ontological Argument Defensible?J. William Forgie - 1976 - New Scholasticism 50 (1):108-121.
Some Thoughts on Duns Scotus and the Ontological Argument.John P. Doyle - 1979 - New Scholasticism 53 (2):234-241.
St. Anselm’s Ontological Argument and Russell’s Theory of Descriptions.Herbert Hochberg - 1959 - New Scholasticism 33 (3):319-330.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
18 (#828,658)

6 months
5 (#837,836)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Imlay
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references