Analogy and the Ontological Argument

New Scholasticism 54 (1):25-33 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00286621

DOI

10.5840/newscholas198054139

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Ontological Argument.R. J. Connelly - 1969 - New Scholasticism 43 (4):530-554.
Descartes’ Ontological Argument: A Causal Argument.Robert A. Imlay - 1971 - New Scholasticism 45 (2):348-351.
Descartes’ Ontological Argument.Robert A. Imlay - 1969 - New Scholasticism 43 (3):440-448.
The Negative Ontological Argument.Michael P. Slattery - 1969 - New Scholasticism 43 (4):614-617.
Is the Cartesian Ontological Argument Defensible?J. William Forgie - 1976 - New Scholasticism 50 (1):108-121.
Descartes’ Ontological Argument as Non-Causal.James M. Humber - 1970 - New Scholasticism 44 (3):449-459.
Some Thoughts on Duns Scotus and the Ontological Argument.John P. Doyle - 1979 - New Scholasticism 53 (2):234-241.
St. Anselm’s Ontological Argument and Russell’s Theory of Descriptions.Herbert Hochberg - 1959 - New Scholasticism 33 (3):319-330.
Analogy and Inference.R. J. Kearney - 1977 - New Scholasticism 51 (2):131-141.
Portraying Analogy. [REVIEW]David Burrell - 1985 - New Scholasticism 59 (3):347-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
23 (#705,674)

6 months
2 (#1,259,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references