Expert and non-expert knowledge in medical practice

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (3):295-302 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One problematic aspect of the rationality of medical practice concerns the relation between expert knowledge and non-expert knowledge. In medical practice it is important to match medical knowledge with the self-knowledge of the individual patient. This paper tries to study the problem of such matching by describing a model for technological paradigms and comparing it with an ideal of technological rationality. The professionalised experts tend to base their decisions and actions mostly on medical knowledge while the rationality of medicine also involves just as important elements of the personal evaluation and knowledge of the patients. Since both types of knowledge are necessary for rational decisions, the gap between the expert and the non-expert has to be bridged in some way. A solution to the problem is suggested in terms of pluralism, with the patient as ultimate decision-maker.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
73 (#204,283)

6 months
3 (#439,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Normal science and its dangers.Karl Popper - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press. pp. 51--8.
Rational diagnosis and treatment.Henrik R. Wulff - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (2):123-134.
The limits of medical practice.Ingemar Nordin - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (2):105-123.
The role of science in medicine.Ingemar Nordin - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (3):227-243.

Add more references