Authors
C. Tyler DesRoches
Arizona State University
Stephen Andrew Inkpen
Harvard University
Abstract
In 2016, a multidisciplinary body of scholars within the International Commission on Stratigraphy—the Anthropocene Working Group—recommended that the world officially recognize the Anthropocene as a new geological epoch. The most contested claim about the Anthropocene, that humans are a major geological and environmental force on par with natural forces, has proven to be a hotbed for discussion well beyond the science of geology. One reason for this is that it compels many natural and social scientists to confront problems and systems that transgress traditional disciplinary boundaries, and as a result, calls for interdisciplinary research are now gaining traction. Proponents of such transgressions have dubbed the new scientific order that will result “Anthropocene Science”, and rhetoric notwithstanding, such discussions exemplify how recent changes within science justify rethinking a prevailing image of how science is done, and with it, the working relationship between scholars in the humanities, natural scientists, and social scientists.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3998/ptpbio.16039257.0011.003
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rethinking Anthropos in the Anthropocene.Charles Brown - 2016 - Dialogue and Universalism 26 (1):31-38.
The Natural History of Aesthetics.Thomas H. Ford - 2015 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 9 (2):220-239.
The Limits of Anthropocene Narratives.Zoltán Boldizsár Simon - 2020 - European Journal of Social Theory 23 (2):184-199.
Saving Earth.Jochem Zwier & Vincent Blok - 2017 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21 (2/3):222-242.
Rebranding the Anthropocene.Langdon Winner - 2017 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21 (2/3):282-294.
The Anthropocene as Fetishism.Daniel Cunha - 2015 - Mediations 28 (2).
The Sublime Anthropocene.Byron Williston - 2016 - Environmental Philosophy 13 (2):155-174.
A Tapestry of Concealments.Byron Williston - 2018 - Environmental Philosophy 15 (2):237-254.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-01-19

Total views
91 ( #103,043 of 2,340,325 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #17,226 of 2,340,325 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes