Action

In Aristotle's first principles. New York: Oxford University Press (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aristotle claims that the soul in animals is defined by two faculties: the discriminative belonging to sense and thought, and the faculty of initiating movement. He insists that the part which initiates movement, the desiring part, is not separable from the other parts and faculties of the soul; to think of this as a separable part is to conceal its essential connexions with other psychic states in a teleological explanation of behaviour. His reasons for insisting on this indicate his guiding assumptions about the nature of psychic states.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Theory of Practice and Action in Paul of Worczyn’s Thought.Magdalena Płotka - 2021 - Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 27 (2):43-58.
Action, movement, and neurophysiology.Don Locke - 1974 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 17 (1-4):23 – 42.
Praxiology and the Reasons for Action.Piotr Makowski, Mateusz Bonecki & Krzysztof Nowak-Posadzy (eds.) - 2015 - New Brunswick, (U.S.A.): Transaction Publishers.
Action, Intention, and Reason.Robert Audi - 1993 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Aristotle's Four Causes of Action.Bryan C. Reece - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (2):213-227.
Action. [REVIEW]J. E. J. - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 24 (3):536-537.
Philosophy of Action.Mahdi Zakeri - 2015 - Tehran: Samt.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references