- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
What is, and ought to be, philosophy of mathematics?
Philosophia Mathematica (1-2):71-75 (1967)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
What is, and ought to be, history of mathematics?J. Fang - 1966 - Philosophia Mathematica (1-2):39-44.
J. R. Lucas. The Conceptual Roots of Mathematics: An Essay on the Philosophy of Mathematics.Bob Hale - 2002 - Philosophia Mathematica 10 (1):90-93.
Review of J. P. Mayberry, The Foundations of Mathematics in the Theory of Sets. [REVIEW]Mary Tiles - 2002 - Philosophia Mathematica 10 (3):324-337.
Review of J. R. Brown, Philosophy of Mathematics: An Introduction to the World of Proofs and Pictures.Micheal D. Resnik - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (1):328-335.
Stewart Shapiro, thinking about mathematics: The philosophy of mathematics.M. D. Resnik - 2001 - Philosophia Mathematica 9 (3):379-382.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-24
Downloads
44 (#352,056)
6 months
1 (#1,722,083)
2010-08-24
Downloads
44 (#352,056)
6 months
1 (#1,722,083)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-2nz2h uwo