A study of some systems in the neighborhood of ${\rm S}4.4$

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 12 (3):341-357 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1305/ndjfl/1093894298

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Bolesław Sobociński. Certain extensions of modal system S4. Notre Dame journal of formal logic, vol. 11 no. 3 , pp. 347–368. - Bolesław Sobociński. Concerning some extensions of S4. Notre Dame journal of formal logic, vol. 12 , pp. 363–370. - G. F. Schumm. Solutions to four modal problems of Sobocinski. Notre Dame journal of formal logic, vol. 12 , pp. 335–340. - J. Jay Zeman. A study of some systems in the neighborhood of S4.4. Notre Dame journal of formal logic, vol. 12 , pp. 341–357. - Bolesław Sobociński. A new class of modal systems. Notre Dame journal of formal logic, vol. 12 , pp. 371–377. - Bolesław Sobociński. A proper subsystem of S4.04. Notre Dame journal of formal logic, vol. 12 , pp. 381–384. [REVIEW]M. J. Cresswell - 1975 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 40 (4):602.
A theorem on ${\rm S}4.2$ and ${\rm S}4.4$.Ivo Thomas - 1967 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 8 (4):335-336.
Modal system ${\rm S}4.4$.Bolesław Sobociński - 1964 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 5 (4):305-312.
Zeman J. Jay. Bases for S4 and S4.2 without added axioms. Notre Dame journal of formal logic, vol. 4 , pp. 227–230.Donald Paul Snyder - 1973 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 38 (2):328-328.
The Gupta-Belnap systems ${\rm S}^\#$ and ${\rm S}^*$ are not axiomatisable.Philip Kremer - 1993 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34 (4):583-596.
Generalized ${\rm S}2$-like systems of propositional modal logic.Mark A. Brown - 1982 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23 (1):53-61.
Concerning some extensions of ${\rm S}4$.Bolesław Sobociński - 1971 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 12 (3):363-370.
${\rm S}3.02={\rm S}3.03$.George F. Schumm - 1974 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 15 (1):147-148.
${\rm S}4.6$ is ${\rm S}4.9$.J. Jay Zeman - 1972 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 13 (1):118-118.
${\rm E}$ and ${\rm S}4$.Robert K. Meyer - 1970 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 11 (2):181-199.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
7 (#603,698)

6 months
19 (#786,843)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Synonymous logics.Francis Jeffry Pelletier & Alasdair Urquhart - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (3):259-285.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references