Development of international guidelines for research ethics A commentary on "scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends"
Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):293-298 (1999)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11948-999-0021-x |
| Options |
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Commentary on "Scientific Misconduct: Present Problems and Future Trends" (B. Mishkin).Debra M. Parrish - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):299-301.
Scientific Misconduct: Present Problems and Future Trends.Barbara Mishkin - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.
Development of International Guidelines for Research Ethics.Matthias Kaiser - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):293-298.
Effectiveness of Research Guidelines in Prevention of Scientific Misconduct.Eleanor G. Shore - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):383-387.
Evolving Research Misconduct Policies and Their Significance for Physical Scientists.James J. Dooley & Helen M. Kerch - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):109-121.
Commentary on “Changing Explanatory Frameworks in the U.S. Government’s Attempts to Define Research Misconduct”. [REVIEW]Margaret Dale - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):158-160.
The History and Future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond. [REVIEW]Chris B. Pascal - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):183-198.
Commentary on “the History and Future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond” (C. Pascal).Kenneth D. Pimple - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):203-204.
Accountability and Responsibility in Research.Patricia K. Woolf - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):595 - 600.
The Swedish Research Council’s Definition of ‘Scientific Misconduct’: A Critique.Håkan Salwén - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1):115-126.
Responding to Allegations of Scientific Misconduct.Jean-Philippe Breittmayer, Martine Bungener, Hugues De The, Evelyne Eschwege, Michel Fougereau, Gilles Guedj, Claude Kordon, Olivier Philippe, Maric-Catherine Postel-Vinay & Laurence Schaffar-Esterle - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):41-48.
Research on Memory Development: Historical Trends and Current Themes.Wolfgang Schneider - 2000 - International Journal of Behavioral Development 24:407-420.
Beyond Conflict of Interest: The Responsible Conduct of Research.Lawrence J. Rhoades - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):459-468.
The American Experience: Lessons Learned. [REVIEW]Lawrence J. Rhoades - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):95-107.
Misconduct in Science and the German Law.Stefanic Stegemann-Bochl - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):57-62.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-02-17
Total views
8 ( #867,789 of 2,280,771 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #573,575 of 2,280,771 )
2017-02-17
Total views
8 ( #867,789 of 2,280,771 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #573,575 of 2,280,771 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
