Perspectives on Science 4 (2):207-230 (1996)

Authors
Matthias Kaiser
University of Bergen
Abstract
This article discusses the widespread belief that secrecy in science is increasing—and that secrecy in science is ethically problematic. To what extent should we worry about this alleged development? In an introduction it is observed that there is very little hard empirical evidence supporting the belief of increasing secrecy in science. Evidence seems mostly to be of the anecdotal kind. The “purist ideology” of science, in which openness of research figures prominently as normative basis, is revealed as one-sided with respect to accepted practice. Issues of commercialization of science and patenting are discussed, and it is claimed that what is ethically problematic is less related to secrecy than to more general ethical issues regarding the social consequences of scientific knowledge. On the basis of a particular case, an area of scientific research is introduced for which it is claimed that secrecy does constitute a serious problem. This area has been characterized, by Funtowicz and Ravetz, as “postnormal science!’ It is claimed that postnormal science and regulatory science necessitate new institutional mechanisms inside science to tackle ethical dilemmas.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/posc_a_00504
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,259
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Genesis of the Concept of Scientific Progress.Edgar Zilsel - 1945 - Journal of the History of Ideas 6 (1/4):325.
Scientists’ Attitudes Toward Data Sharing.Stephen J. Ceci - 1988 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 13 (1-2):45-52.
Secrecy and Openness in Science: Ethical Considerations.Sissela Bok - 1982 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 7 (1):32-41.
Case Study: Openness and Secrecy in Computer Research.John C. Cherniavsky - 1985 - Science, Technology and Human Values 10 (2):99-103.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Scientists and War.Solly Zuckerman Zuckerman - 1967 - New York: Harper & Row.
The Golem: Uncertainty and Communicating Science. [REVIEW]Professor Trevor Pinch - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):511-523.
International Science and Fair-Play Practices.Prof Dr Pieter J. D. Drenth - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):5-11.
Consensus and Evolution in Science.Gonzalo Munevar - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:120 - 129.
On Teaching Computer Ethics Within a Computer Science Department.Michael J. Quinn - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (2):335-343.
Science and the Problem of Psi.Kenneth L. Shewmaker & Carlton W. Berenda - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (2):195-203.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-29

Total views
2 ( #1,452,994 of 2,518,683 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,683 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes