Openness versus Secrecy in Scientific Research

Episteme 2 (3):135-147 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Openness is one of the most important principles in scientifi c inquiry, but there are many good reasons for maintaining secrecy in research, ranging from the desire to protect priority, credit, and intellectual property, to the need to safeguard the privacy of research participants or minimize threats to national or international security. This article examines the clash between openness and secrecy in science in light of some recent developments in information technology, business, and politics, and makes some practical suggestions for resolving confl icts between openness and secrecy

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Inverse Relationship between Secrecy and Privacy.Julie Cohen - 2010 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 77 (2):883-898.
The Inverse Relationship between Secrecy and Privacy.Julie E. Cohen - 2010 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 77 (3):883-898.
Case Study: Openness and Secrecy in Computer Research.John C. Cherniavsky - 1985 - Science, Technology and Human Values 10 (2):99-103.
Openness versus secrecy? Historical and historiographical remarks.Koen Vermeir - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Science 45 (2):165-188.
Openness and Secrecy in Science: Some Notes on Early History.Ernan McMullin - 1985 - Science, Technology and Human Values 10 (2):14-22.
The morality of scientific openness.Christian Munthe & Stellan Welin - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):411-428.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-11

Downloads
65 (#86,957)

6 months
7 (#1,397,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Communism and the Incentive to Share in Science.Remco Heesen - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (4):698-716.
Scientific Sharing, Communism, and the Social Contract.Michael Strevens - 2017 - In Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Conor Mayo-Wilson & Michael Weisberg (eds.), Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge. New York, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 3--33.
States of secrecy: an introduction.Koen Vermeir & Dániel Margócsy - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Science 45 (2):153-164.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations.Robert King Merton - 1973 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Norman W. Storer.
Responsible conduct of research.Adil E. Shamoo - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by David B. Resnik.

View all 15 references / Add more references