A comprehensive and developmental theory of ADHD is tantalizing, but premature

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):430-431 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this commentary, I argue that the theory presented by Sagvolden et al. can be much stronger if its scope is limited, if its developmental aspects are refined, if it can be made to generate testable predictions, and if it can be supported with more data from humans.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

RED: ADHD under the “micro-scope” of the rat model.Katya Rubia - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):439-440.
A developmental theory requires developmental data.Kim A. Bard - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (3):511-512.
What can developmental disorders tell us about modularity?Gary F. Marcus - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):762-763.
Confounding explanations. . .R. I. M. Dunbar - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2):283-283.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
4 (#1,013,551)

6 months
32 (#484,314)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references