Reply to Gibson

Philosophical Issues 4:174-179 (1993)

Abstract
This is a reply by J.J. Katz to criticism of his views on Quine's indeterminacy thesis.
Keywords J.J. Katz  W.V. Quine  Indeterminacy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/1522839
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,330
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Gibson Isn't Missing After All: A Reply to Heil.Stephen Wilcox & Stuart Katz - 1981 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 11 (3):313–317.
What Heil is Missing in Gibson: A Reply.Harry Heft - 1980 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 10 (3):187–193.
Incommensurability and the "Omission" in Gibson's Theory: A Second Reply to Heil.Harry Heft - 1982 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 12 (3):345–347.
Consciousness and Gibson's Concept of Awareness.Thomas Natsoulas - 1995 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 3 (3):305-28.
The Myth of Passive Perception: A Reply to Richards.James J. Gibson - 1976 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (December):234-238.
Reply to Gibson, Byrne, and Brandom.John McDowell - 1996 - Philosophical Issues 7:283-300.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
29 ( #287,437 of 2,254,902 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #1,009,469 of 2,254,902 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature