Sham arguments and capital punishment

Criminal Justice Ethics 16 (2):3-6 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
33 (#482,422)

6 months
1 (#1,464,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Keith Burgess-Jackson
University of Texas at Arlington

Citations of this work

Trite arguments and hypocrisy: A rejoinder.Keith Burgess-Jackson - 1997 - Criminal Justice Ethics 16 (2):8-10.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The case for animal rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.

Add more references