Halloween, Organization, and the Ethics of Uncanny Celebration

Journal of Business Ethics 161 (1):103-114 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between organizational ethics, the uncanny, and the annual celebration of Halloween. We begin by exploring the traditional and contemporary organizational function of Halloween as ‘tension-management ritual’ :44–59, 2000) through which collective fears, anxieties, and fantasies are played out and given material expression. Combining the uncanny with the folkloric concept of ostension, we then examine an incident in which UK supermarket retailers made national news headlines for selling offensive Halloween costumes depicting ‘escaped mental patients’. Rather than treating this incident as a problem of moral hygiene—in which products are removed, apologies made, and lessons learned—we consider the value of Halloween as a unique and disruptive ethical encounter with the uncanny Other. Looking beyond its commercial appeal and controversy, we reflect on the creative, generous, and disruptive potential of Halloween as both tension-management ritual and unique organizational space of hospitality through which to receive and embrace alterity and so discover the homely within the unheimlich.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-29

Downloads
13 (#1,044,693)

6 months
2 (#1,445,320)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The uncanny.Nicholas Royle - 2003 - New York: Routledge.
The limits of corporate responsibility standards.Andreas Rasche - 2010 - Business Ethics: A European Review 19 (3):280-291.
Ethics, alterity, and organizational justice.Damian Byers & Carl Rhodes - 2007 - Business Ethics: A European Review 16 (3):239-250.

View all 9 references / Add more references