How We Act [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 59 (2):418-419 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The first chapter of the book is a helpful review of much of the current literature on action theory, focused around the idea of “volition.” Enç’s foil, set out in this chapter, is the existence of “irreducible mental acts”—acts that have no antecedent events as causes—as defended by proponents of agent causation. He claims he can fully account for human action without appeal to such acts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How We Act. [REVIEW]Thomas A. Cavanaugh - 2005 - International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (2):266-268.
How We Act. [REVIEW]Thomas A. Cavanaugh - 2005 - International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (2):266-268.
How we act: causes, reasons, and intentions.Berent Enç - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
How We Act: Causes, Reasons, and Intentions.Jesus H. Aguilar - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (4):548-550.
How We Act: Causes, Reasons, and Intentions. [REVIEW]Jesus H. Aguilar - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (4):548-550.
On Berent Enc's 'How We Act'. [REVIEW]Constantine Sandis - 2005 - Philosophical Books 46 (2):170-174.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
29 (#569,467)

6 months
2 (#1,259,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Kern
Chaffey College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references