Propertius 1.9.30

Classical Quarterly 42 (01):282- (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some time ago I noted that the generally accepted emendations a! fuge , and a! ducere are suspect , 71–2). In his recent Loeb edition , Goold in the latter passage restores the MSS. reading adducere; in the former, quisquis es assiduas aufuge blanditias, he prints Tappe's tu fuge for MSS. aufuge. The best solution, it seems to me, is one which the modern editions, Propertiana included, are of a mind to ignore: Markland's heu fuge

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,707

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Propertius 1.16.38.Allan Kershaw - 1991 - Classical Quarterly 41 (01):258-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-09

Downloads
11 (#1,158,008)

6 months
1 (#1,501,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references